muğla escort escort aydın escort çanakkale bayan escort balıkesir escort bayan tekirdağ gebze escort mersin escort bayan escort buca escort edirne

Blog Archive


This post is in our Javascript Primer series, a collections of articles aimed at .Net and back-end developers who are transition to client-side UX development.  In a previous installment, the topic of publish-subscribe design pattern was featured, and this pattern fostered loosely coupled ViewModels.  It is recommended that you read that post as well, as this edition of our primer builds on those concepts.

A basic tenant to good programming is to break down activities to small components.  Smaller functions are easier to maintain.  In many instances the information that the users are working with is best presented in logical groups, dissected so that an improper decision can never be made.  A rich user interface may force you to break a larger object into several ViewModels.  But guess what?  If you need to break information down, will also need to re-assemble this information to transmit back to mother ship to be stored in your database.

Challenges for the ViewModels

There are several challenges ahead for you if need your ViewModels to communicate, and you want to retain the agility provided to you with loose coupling.  If you recall the architecture we established with the publish and subscribe design pattern, all our “pieces” are highly independent from one another.  But we now have a complication.  Independence also means blissful ignorance.  Each ViewModel only knows how to contribute their small portions of information for glorious “mother object”.  The best it can is yield up what it has and somehow, someway, something will piece things together.

Let’s consider a code example:

We have simple project tracker that has a name, a roster of workers and a calendar that displays each workers start date.  Each tab is serviced by a ViewModel.  The “Project Info” tab shares the project name information with “Team”.  The tab “Team” shares the project team data with both the “Project Info” and the “Timeline” tabs.  This is accomplished using the publish and subscribe pattern that was detailed in this post.  You should review that post is your are unfamiliar with postaljs or with the publish and subscribe design pattern.

The challenge here is that we want a “Save” button that will easily gather the data from each tab and save it our project object.   We also want this controlling activity to be flexible and allow each ViewModel to supply the data needed without too much orchestration: in other words, we just ask the ViewModel “What do you have for a project object”, and each ViewModel fulfills its responsibility.

Pipe and Filter Pattern For Chaining Events or Commands

Many of you with a background in server side application development may recognize the pipe and filter pattern.  Simply said, it is a way to chain a set of operations that are to be performed in succession.  This diagram is a depiction of the pipe and filter:


The “Filter” is a function that performs one thing.  Our pipe is the “orchestrator” or directory in that it will forward to each filter as ordered.

For our purposes we will continue to use postaljs as our communication mechanism.  We’ll need a pipeline that will keep track of which filter to execute and forward data to each subsequent filter of the process chain.

var pipeline = {
  index: 0,
  filters: ["edit.getViewOneData","edit.getViewTwoData","edit.finalDestination"]

The property “filters” contains the names of the postaljs topics that will kick off a function.  In this case we will need 3 subscriptions that listen for items listed in the “filters” array.  Each process step, or filter, will be executed in the order that listed in the “filters” array: in this case, “edit.getViewOneData” will be executed first.  The property “index” tracks which filter is being processed.  As each filter is executed, it will increment index, then use index to access the next topic in the chain of events.  Starting off the process is accomplished in this fashion:

// Now start up the pipeline, fire off the first step that will execute the first filter
  channel: "pipenfilter",
  topic: pipeline.filters[pipeline.index],
  data: pipeline

//  A sample subscription.  This will be executed first since it is listed first in the pipeline.filters array
  channel: "pipenfilter",
  topic: "edit.getViewOneData",
  callback: function (pipeline, env) {

//  After filter performs, it needs to call the next filter in the chain<
var fetchViewOneData = function(pipeline){
  // ... perform activities with some data

  //  To forward to next step, increment the index

  //  Now forward to the next filter
    channel: "pipenfilter",
    topic: pipeline.filters[pipeline.index],
    data: pipeline

For our particular scenario with the project UX above we will have to do a few simple things:

  1. The ViewModels “ProjectInfo”, “Budget” and “Team” will need subscriptions to a “pipenfilter” channel
  2. Each ViewModel will need a corresponding filter function, so the “Team” ViewModel will get a “fetchTeamFilter”
  3. Add an endpoint in our $(document).ready section to act as a controller for the pipeline process.  Since we don’t have a controller this logic can sit here.  Naturally for cleaner production code you’ll want to be a bit cleaner and place this in a controller object.

All of the addition changes are noted with a “New pipe and filter” comment, so you can search through the Javascript to see where the changes have been made.  Most of the updates are just a few lines, and the nice thing is that the code to forward to the next filter is the same each time.  Not much exciting stuff to be seen other than incrementing the index and passing the data to the next topic.

Where No One Has Gone Before (just sayin’)

Now that you can synchronize your data, assemble it back into a proper object, you can begin your next journey.  There’s many long term benefits here that you will begin to realize.  What if you need to add an additional ViewModel, or what if you need to change which ViewModel display the groupings of data?  Without our pipe and filter solution, you would need to change a lot of things.  With what we have described here, the most that have to do is to add an additional filter name to the pipeline list and make sure that your additional ViewModel functioned properly.  The other ViewModels are left untouched.

Another benefit is also be that you can control what functions are fired while allowing the ViewModels to do their thing.  What if you had a ViewModel that published changes to other ViewModels after it finished performing calculations.  By ordering the filters in the pipeline accordingly, you can allow the ViewModels to do that hard work and be assured that all aspects of your data is up to date.  Doing more with less code means you can test and maintain this code with confidence.

ActiveEngine Software by ActiveEngine, LLC.